COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |

University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Computer Laboratory Automated Reasoning Group Lunches > The Strategy Challenge in Computer Algebra

## The Strategy Challenge in Computer AlgebraAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal - Grant Olney Passmore (University of Cambridge)
- Tuesday 22 February 2011, 13:15-14:15
- Computer Laboratory, William Gates Building, Room SS03.
If you have a question about this talk, please contact William Denman. In automated deduction, strategy is a vital ingredient in effective proof search. Strategy comes in many forms, but the key is this: user-specifiable adaptations of general reasoning mechanisms reduce the search space by tailoring its exploration to a particular class of problems. In fully automatic theorem provers, this may happen through formula weights, term orders and quantifier triggers. In interactive proof assistants, one may build strategies by programming tactics and carefully crafting systems of rewrite rules. Given that automated deduction often takes place over undecidable theories, the recognition of a need for strategy is natural and happened early in the field. In computer algebra, the situation is rather different. In computer algebra, the theories one works over are often decidable but inherently infeasible. For instance, the theory of real closed fields (i.e., nonlinear real arithmetic) is decidable, but any full quantifier elimination algorithm for it is guaranteed to have worst-case doubly exponential time complexity. The situation is similar with algebraically closed fields (e.g., through Groebner bases), and many others. Usually, decision procedures arising from computer algebra admit little means for a user to control them. But, when it comes to practical applications, is an infeasible theory really so different from an undecidable one? The Strategy Challenge in Computer Algebra is this: To build theoretical and practical tools allowing users to exert strategic control over the execution of core computer algebra algorithms. In this way, such algorithms may be tailored to specific problem domains. For formal verification efforts, the focus of this challenge upon decision procedures is especially relevant. In this talk, we will motivate this challenge and present two examples from our dissertation: (i) the theory of Abstract Groebner Bases and its use in developing new Groebner basis algorithms tailored to the needs of SMT solvers (joint with Leo de Moura), and (ii) the theory of Abstract Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition and a family of real quantifier elimination algorithms tailored to the structure of nonlinear real arithmetic problems arising in specific formal verification tool-chains. The former forms the foundation of nonlinear arithmetic in the SMT solver Z3, and the latter forms the basis of our tool RAHD (Real Algebra in High Dimensions). This talk is part of the Computer Laboratory Automated Reasoning Group Lunches series. ## This talk is included in these lists:- All Talks (aka the CURE list)
- Computer Laboratory Automated Reasoning Group Lunches
- Computer Laboratory talks
- Computer Laboratory, William Gates Building, Room SS03
- School of Technology
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
## Other listsCambridge Neuroscience Seminar: New Approaches in Neuroscience Graduate Development Lecture Series Greece and its History## Other talksSurviving the 21st Century Machine Learning demystified: ask the right questions Woofing it down – lessons on the neurobiology of appetite from man’s best friend Colour and colourants in manuscripts: The role of technical analyses Mercury: Geology of the sun's innermost planet Methods and math in cognitive neuroscience |