|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
On the Tradeoff between Economic Efficiency and Strategyproofness in Randomized Social Choice
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Felix Fischer.
Two fundamental notions in microeconomic theory are efficiency—no agent can be made better off without making another one worse off—and strategyproofness—no agent can obtain a more preferred outcome by misrepresenting his preferences. When social outcomes are probability distributions (or lotteries) over alternatives, there are varying degrees of these notions depending on how preferences over alternatives are extended to preference over lotteries. We show that efficiency and strategyproofness are incompatible to some extent when preferences are defined using stochastic dominance (SD) and therefore introduce a natural weakening of SD based on Savage’s sure-thing principle (ST). While random serial dictatorship is SD-strategyproof, it only satisfies ST-efficiency. Our main result is that strict maximal lotteries—an appealing class of social decision schemes due to Kreweras and Fishburn—satisfy SD-efficiency and ST-strategyproofness.
This talk is part of the Optimization and Incentives Seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsJustice and Communities Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University Genetics Seminar Cambridge Centre for Political Thought
Other talksCambridge-Lausanne Workshop 2018 - Day 2 Solution principles for next-generation text entry 2017 PublicHealth@Cambridge Network Showcase Beyond Clicktivism: New Models for Exposing Human Rights Violations in the Digital Age Observations from the Edge of Beauty ~ an Arts-Science Collaboration Defining “Good” in “Good Energy Policy”: Insights from Theologies and Religions