University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science > When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and values

  Browse A-Z

Log in

University Account External (via Google)

🔐 Log In

Information on

Subscribing to talksdetails Finding a talkdetails Adding a talkdetails Disseminating talksdetails Help and Documentationdetails

ℹ️ Information

When is measurement good? Evidence, validity, and values

Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ahmad Elabbar .

The quality of a measurement procedure may be evaluated, among other criteria, by (i) the quality of knowledge it produces about the measurand, (ii) the relevance of its results for guiding human decision making and action, and (iii) the desirability of its impacts on individuals, society, and nature. These criteria are compatible in principle, but their application involves conflicting commitments regarding the aims and methods of measurement. I call these distinct sets of commitments ‘modes of measurement quality evaluation’, and show that value trade-offs are insufficient to reconcile them. I illustrate these claims using examples from the contemporary measurement of time and mental health.

This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

Other lists

Senior Parlour, Gonville & Caius College Cambridge University Engineering Department, LR10 Cambridge Assessment, 1 Regent Street, Cambridge, UK

Other talks

TBC Online Causal Inference Semina Grand Rounds - Equine Topic Film, TV shows for Medical Education, ‘The Wire’ as a case study Cambridge AI in Medicine Seminar - July 2026 Think Before you Speak: Next Gen LLMs with Global Reasoning and External Memory
 

© 2006-2025 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity