Generating Bayesian networks in Forensic Science An example from crime linkage
- đ¤ Speaker: Jacob de Zoete (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
- đ Date & Time: Wednesday 28 September 2016, 13:30 - 14:15
- đ Venue: Seminar Room 1, Newton Institute
Abstract
Co-author: Marjan Sjerps (Netherlands Forensic Institute)
The likelihood ratio framework for evaluating evidence is becoming more common in forensic practice. As a result, the interest in Bayesian networks as a tool to analyse cases and performing computations has increased. However, constructing a Bayesian network from scratch for every situation that one encounters is too costly. Therefore, several researchers have proposed Bayesian networks that correspond with frequent problems [1,2]. These `building blocks' allow the user to only concentrate on the conditional probabilities that fit their particular situation. This results in a more efficient workflow: the effort to construct the Bayesian network is taken away. Furthermore, it is no longer necessary that the user is experienced in constructing Bayesian networks. However, when the problem does not follow the `exact' assumptions of the building block, the Bayesian network can only serve as a starting point when constructing a model that does. In some situations, it is clear how one should model a certain problem, regardless of the case specific details. For example, a Bayesian network for a source level hypotheses pair where the evidence consists of a DNA profile has the same structure for any number of loci. Each locus can be added as a node together with it's corresponding drop-out/drop-in probabilities. For these type of problems, one can take away the effort of constructing the network. This facilitates the practical application of Bayesian networks for forensic casework. We will show an example of `generating Bayesian networks' for a problem from crime linkage. In [3] a structure for modeling crime linkage with Bayesian networks is introduced. This structure is implemented in R which allows the user to insert the parameters corresponding to their situation (e.g. the number of crimes/number of different types of evidence). Subsequently, this network can be used to obtain posterior probabilities or likelihood ratios. We will show how this is useful in casework.
Series This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series.
Included in Lists
- All CMS events
- bld31
- Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery (C2D3)
- Cambridge talks
- Chris Davis' list
- dh539
- Featured lists
- INI info aggregator
- Interested Talks
- Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series
- ndk22's list
- ob366-ai4er
- rp587
- School of Physical Sciences
- Seminar Room 1, Newton Institute
- Trust & Technology Initiative - interesting events
- yk449
Note: Ex-directory lists are not shown.
![[Talks.cam]](/static/images/talkslogosmall.gif)

Jacob de Zoete (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
Wednesday 28 September 2016, 13:30-14:15